OBC Creamy layer order dated 8-9-1993

This is the original order on obc creamy layer eligibility conditions. All the later orders are amendements to this original orders. Hence read this letter carefully.

simplified clarifications on obc non-creamy layer:

Creamy Layer
Description of category	To whom rule of exclusion will apply
I. Constitutional Posts	Sons and daughter(s) of – (a) President of India; (b) Vice-President of India; (c) Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts; (d) Chairman and Members of UPSC and of the State Public Service Commission; Chief Election Commissioner; Comptroller and Auditor-General of India; (e) Persons holding constitutional positions of like nature.
II. Service Category A. Group ‘A’/Class I Officers of the All India Central and State Services (Direct Recruits)	Son(s) and daughter(s) of – (a) parents, both of whom are Class I officers; (b) parents, either of whom is a Class I officer; c) parents, both of whom are Class I officers, but one of them dies or suffers permanent incapacitation; (d) parents, either of whom is a Class I officer and such parents dies or suffers permanent incapacitation and before such death or such incapacitation has had the benefit of employment in any International Organisation like UN, IMF, World bank, etc., for a period of not less than 5 years; (e) parents, both of whom are Class I officers die or suffer permanent incapacitation and before such death or such incapacitation of the both either of them has had the benefit of employment in any International Organisation like UN, IMF, World Bank, etc. for a period of not less than 5 years; Provided that the rule of exclusion shall not apply in the following cases :- (a) Sons and daughters of parents either of whom or both of whom are Class I officers and such parent(s) dies/die or suffer permanent incapacitation; (b) A lady belonging to OBC category has got married to a Class I officer, and may herself like to apply for job.
B. Group ‘B’/Class II Officers of the Central and State Services (Direct Recruitment)	Son(s) and daughter(s) of – (a) parents, both of whom are Class II officers; (b) parents of whom only the husband is a Class II officer and he gets into Class I at the age of 40 or earlier; (c) parents, both of whom are Class II officers and one of them dies or suffers permanent incapacitation and either one of them has had the benefit of employment in any International Organisation UN, IMF, World Bank, etc., for a period of not less than 5 years before such death or permanent incapacitation; (d) parents of whom the husband is a Class I officer (direct recruitment or pre-forty promoted) and the wife is a Class II officer and the wife dies; or suffers permanent incapacitation; and (e) Parents, of whom the wife is a Class I officer (Direct Recruit or pre-forty promoted) and the husband is a Class II officer and the husband dies or suffers permanent incapacitation; Provided that the rule of exclusion shall not apply in the following cases:- Sons and daughters of – (a) Parents both of whom are Class II officers and one of them dies or suffers permanent incapacitation. (b) Parents, both of whom are Class II officers and both of them die or suffer permanent incapacitation, even though either of them has had the benefit of employment in any International Organisation like UN, IMF, World Bank, etc, for a period of not less than 5 years before their death or permanent incapacitation.
C. Employees in Public Sector Undertakings, etc.	The criteria enumerated in A and B above in this category will apply mutatis mutandis to officers holding equivalent or comparable posts in PSUs, Banks, Insurance Organisations, Universities, etc., and also to equivalent or comparable posts and positions under private employment, pending the evaluation of the posts on equivalent or comparable basis in these institutions, the criteria specified in Category VI below will apply to the officers in these Institutions.
III. Armed forces including Paramilitary Forces (Persons holding civil posts are not included).	Son(s) and daughter(s) of parents either or both of whom is or are in the rank of Colonel and above in the Army and to equivalent posts in the Navy and the Air Force and the Paramilitary Forces; Provided that – (i) If the wife of an armed forces officer is herself in the armed forces (i.e., the category under consideration) the rule of exclusion will apply only when she herself has reached the rank of Colonel; (ii) the service ranks below Colonel of husband and wife shall not be clubbed together; (iii) if the wife of an officer in the armed forces is in civil employment, this will not be taken into account for applying the rule of exclusion unless she falls in the service category under item No. II in which case the criteria and conditions enumerated therein will apply to her independently.
IV. Professional class and those engaged in Trade and Industry (i) Persons engaged in profession as a doctor,lawyer, chartered accountant, income tax consultant, financial or management consultant, dental surgeon, engineer, architect, computer specialist, film artists and other film professional, author, playwright, sports person, sports professional, media professional or any other vocations of like status.	Criteria specified against Category VI will apply
(ii) Persons engaged in trade, business and industry.	Criteria specified against Category VI will apply. EXPLANATION – (i) Where the husband is in some profession and the wife is in a Class II or lower grade employment, the income/wealth test will apply only on the basis of the husband’s income. (ii) If the wife is in any profession and the husband is in employment in a Class II or lower rank post, then the income/wealth criterion will apply only on the basis of the wife’s income and the husband’s income will not be clubbed with it.
V. Property Owners A. Agricultural holding.	Son(s) and daughter(s) of persons belonging to a family (father, mother and minor children) which owns- (a) only irrigated land which is equal to or more than 85% of the statutory ceiling area, or (b) both irrigated and unirrigated land, as follows:- (i) The rule of exclusion will apply where the pre-condition exists that the irrigated area (having been brought to a single type under a common denominator) 40% or more of the statutory ceiling limit for irrigated land (this being calculated by excluding the unirrigated portion). If this pre-condition of not less than 40% exists, then only the area of unirrigated land will be taken into account. This will be done by converting, the unirrigated land on the basis of the conversion formula existing, into the irrigated type. The irrigated area so computed from unirrigated land shall be added to the actual area of irrigated land and if after such clubbing together the total area in terms of irrigated land is 85% or more of the statutory ceiling limit for irrigated land, then the rule of exclusion will apply and disentitlement will occur.) (ii) The rule of exclusion will not apply if the land holding of a family is exclusively unirrigated.
B. Plantations (i) Coffee, tea, rubber, etc. (ii) Mango, citrus, apple plantations, etc.	Criteria of income/wealth specified in Category VI below will apply. Deemed as agricultural holding and hence criteria at A above under this category will apply. Criteria specified in Category VI below will apply.
C. Vacant land and/or buildings in urban Agglomerations.	EXPLANATION:- Building may be used for residential, industrial or commercial purpose and the like two or more such purposes.
VI. Income/Wealth Test	Son(s) daughter(s) – (a) Persons having gross annual income of Rs. 1 lakh or above or possessing wealth above the exemption limit as prescribed in the Wealth Act for a period of three consecutive years. (b) Persons in Categories I, II, III and V-A who are not disentitled to the benefit of reservation but have income from other sources of wealth which will bring them within the income/wealth criteria mentioned in (a) above. EXPLANATION:- (i) Income from salaries or agricultural land shall not be clubbed; (ii) The income criteria in terms of rupee will be modified taking into account the change in its value every three years. If the situation, however, so demands, the interregnum may be less. EXPLANATION—Wherever the expression “permanent incapacitation” occur in this schedule, it shall mean incapacitation which results in putting an officer out of service.

List of OBC communites in each state

CENTRAL LIST OF OTHER BACKWARD CLASSES

Sl.No.	Name of the States
1	ANDHRA PRADESH
2	ASSAM
3	BIHAR
4	CHANDIGARH
5	DADRA AND NAGAR HAVELI
6	DAMAN AND DIU
7	N.C.T. OF DELHI
8	GOA
9	GUJARAT
10	HARYANA
11	HIMACHAL PRADESH
12	JAMMU & KASHMIR
13	KARNATAKA
14	KERALA
15	MADHYA PRADESH
16	MAHARASHTRA
17	MANIPUR
18	ORISSA
19	PUDUCHERRY
20	PUNJAB
21	RAJASTHAN
22	SIKKIM
23	TAMILNADU
24	TRIPURA
25	UTTAR PRADESH
26	UTTARANCHAL
27	WEST BENGAL
28	ANDAMAN & NICOBAR

OBC Creamy layer order extending to 4.5 Lakhs

Government clarifications on OBC Creamy Layer Letter dated 14 October 2004

This govt order clarifies the following doubts on obc creamy layer: 1. If your father is a class I officer and he retires. whether you are creamy or non-creamly layer/ 2.If your father is class III employee and later promoted to class I, whether you are coming under creamy layer. this order the Letter nO.369033/2/2004/estt(res) dated 14 october 2004

OBC Certificate Format

The following is the format for community certificate for obc
non-creamy layer.
Do NOT use the following form.    Please CLICK HERE to download the PDF format and use it
This is to cerfify that ..:.............................................................................

son of ......................................of Village .....................................................
District/Division..........................................................................
in the State ................................................

belongs to the ......................................community which is recognised
as a backward class under the

Government of India, Ministry of Welfare Resolution Nc,. 12011/6Xl93-DCC(C),
dated 10th Sept.1993 published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary Part I Section-'I dated
13th Sept. 1993.

Shri .............................. and/or his .family ordinarily reside(s)
in the .............................District/Division of

the ....................... State. This is also to certify that helshe does
not belong to the persons/sections

(Creamy Layer) mentioned in column 3 of the Schedule to the Go~cr~:tncnotf India.
Department of

Personnel & Training O.M. No. 36012122193-Estt (SCT), dated 8-9-93.

Dated :

Seal

Government Order on OBC Creamy Layer

Most
of the people who are eligible obc category are not availing this golden opportunity
because they dont know whether they are coming under non-creamy layer or not.
This site is designed only for clarifying this doubt

 

The following is the Government Order dated 14.10.2004
on clarification of obc creamy layer

 

No.36033/5/2004-Estt.(Res.)
Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training New Delhi ,dated :the 14th October,2004

 

To

The
Chief Secretaries of all the States/Union Territories.

Subject:
Clarifications regarding creamy layer amongst OBCs.

****

Sir,

I
am directed to invite your attention to the Schedule to this Department’s
OM No.36012/22/93­(SCT) dated 8th September, 1993 which contains the criteria
to determine the creamy layer amongst the OBCs. In regard to the children of
the persons in civil services of the Central and the State Governments, it provides
that son(s) and daughter(s) of:

(a)
parents, both of whom are directly recruited Class I/Group A officers;

(b)
parents, either of whom is a directly recruited Class I/Group A officer;

(c)
parents, both of whom are directly recruited Class I/Group A officers, but one
of them dies or suffers permanent incapacitation;

(d)
parents, either of whom is a directly recruited Class I/ Group A officer and
such parent dies or suffers permanent in – capacitation and before such
death or such incapacitation has had the benefit of employment in any International
Organisation like UN, IMF, World Bank, etc. for a period of not less than 5
years;

(e)
parents, both of whom are directly recruited Class I/Group A officers and both
of them die or suffer permanent incapacitation and before such death or such
incapacitation of the both, either of them has had the benefit of employment
International Organisation like UN, IMF, World Bank, etc. for a period of not
less than 5 years;

(f)
parents both of whom are directly recruited Class II/Group B officer;

(g)
parents of whom only the husband is a directly recruited Class II/Group B officer
and he gets into Class I/Group A at the age of 40 or earlier;

(h)
parents, both of whom are directly recruited Class II/ Group B officers and
one of them dies or suffers permanent incapacitation and either of them has
had the benefit of employment is any International Organisation like UN, IMF,
World Bank, etc. for a period of not less than 5 year;

(i)
parents of whom the husband is a Class I/Group A officer (direct recruit or
pre-forty promoted) and the wife is a directly recruited Class II/Group B officer
and the wife dies; or suffers permanent incapacitation; and

(j)
parents, of whom wife is a Class I/Group A officer (Direct Recruit or pre-forty
promoted) and the husband is a directly recruited Class II/Group B officer and
the husband dies or suffers permanent incapacitation shall be treated as falling
in creamy layer.

2.
The Schedule further provides that sons and daughters of:

(i)
parents either of whom or both of whom are directly recruited Class I/Group
A officer(s) and such parents(s) dies/die or suffers/suffer permanent incapacitation;

(ii)
parents both of whom are directly recruited Class II/Group B officers and one
of them dies or suffers permanent incapacitation;

(iii)
parents both of whom are directly recruited Class II/Group B officers and both
of them die or suffer permanent incapacitation, even though either of them has
had the benefit of employment in any International Organisation like UN, IMF,
World Bank, etc. for a period of not less than 5 years before their death or
permanent incapacitation shall not be treated to be falling in creamy layer.

1
The criteria prescribed for determining creamy layer status of sons and daughters
of persons in Government service mutatis mutandis applies to the sons and daughters
of persons holding equivalent or comparable posts in PSUs, Banks, Insurance
Organisations, Universities, etc. and also holding equivalent or comparable
posts and positions under private employment. The creamy layer status of the
sons and daughters of employees of organizations where evaluation of the posts
on equivalent or comparable basis has not been made is determined on the basis
of ‘Income/Wealth Test’ given in the Schedule. The Income/Wealth
Test prescribes that the sons and daughters of persons having gross annual income
of Rs.2.5 lakh or above or possessing wealth above the exemption limit as prescribed
in the Wealth Tax Act for a period of three consecutive years would be treated
to fall in creamy layer. An explanation is given below the Income/Wealth Test
which provides that ‘income from salaries or agricultural land shall not
be clubbed.

2
Following questions have been raised from time to time about the application
of the above provisions to determine creamy layer:

(i)
Will the sons and daughters of parents either of whom or both of whom are directly
recruited Class I/Group A officer(s) and such parent(s) dies/die or suffers/suffer
permanent incapacitation after retirement be treated to be excluded from the
creamy layer?

(ii)
Will the sons and daughters of parents both of whom are directly recruited Class
II/Group B officers and one of them dies or suffer permanent incapacitation
after retirement be treated to be excluded from the creamy layer?

(iii)
Will the sons and daughters of parents both of whom are directly recruited Class
II/Group B officers and both of them die or suffer permanent incapacitation
after retirement even though either of them has had got the benefit of employment
in any International Organisation like UN, IMF, World Bank, etc. for a period
of not less than 5 years before their death or permanent incapacitation be treated
to be excluded from the purview of creamy layer?

(iv)
Will the sons and daughters of parent(s) who retire from the service on the
basis of which their sons and daughters fall in creamy layer, continue to fall
in creamy layer after retirement of the parent(s)?

(v)
Will the sons and daughters of parents of whom husband is directly recruited
Class III/Group C or Class IV/ Group D employee and he gets into Class I/Group
A at the age of 40 or earlier be treated to be falling in creamy layer?

(vi)
Will a candidate who himself is a directly recruited Class I/Group A officer
or a directly recruited Class II/Group B officer who got into Class I/Group
A at the age of 40 or earlier be treated to be falling in creamy layer on the
basis of his service status?

(vii)
Will a candidate who has gross annual income of Rs.2.5 lakh or above or possesses
wealth above the Exemption limit as prescribed in the Wealth Tax Act for a period
of three consecutive years be treated to fall in creamy layer?

(viii)
The instructions provide that a lady belonging to OBC category who has got married
to a directly recruited Class I/Group A officer shall not be treated as falling
in creamy layer on the basis of her marriage. Will a man belonging to OBC category
who is married to a directly recruited Class I/Group ‘A’ officer
be treated as falling in creamy layer on the basis of his marriage?

(ix)
How will be the Income/Wealth Test apply in case of Sons and daughters of parent(s)
employed in PSUs etc. in which equivalence or comparability of posts has not
been established vis-à-vis posts in the Government?

(x)
What is the scope of the explanation, ‘Income salaries or agricultural
land shall not be clubbed’, given below the Income/ Wealth Test?

5.
It is clarified in regard to clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of para 4 that the
sons and daughters of

(a)
parents either of whom or both of whom are directly recruited Class I/Group
A officers and such parent(s) dies/die or suffers/suffer permanent incapacitation
while in service;

(b)
parents both of whom are directly recruited Class II/Group B officers and one
of them dies or suffers permanent incapacitation while in service; and

(c)
parents both of whom are directly recruited Class II/Group B officers and both
of them die or suffer permanent incapacitation while in service, even though
either of them has benefit of employment in any International Organization like
UN,IMF, World Bank, etc. for a period of not less than 5 years before their
death or permanent incapacitation are not treated to be falling in creamy layer.
But if the parent(s) dies/die or suffers/suffer permanent incapacitation in
such cases after retirement from service, his/their sons and daughters would
be treated to be falling in creamy layer and would not get the benefit of reservation.

6.
In regard to clause (iv) of para 4, it is clarified that sons and daughters
of parents who are included in the creamy layer on the basis of service status
of their parents shall continue to be treated in creamy layer even if their
parents have retired or have died after retirement.

7.
In regard to clause (v) of para 4, it is clarified that the sons and daughters
of parents of whom only the husband is a directly recruited Class II/Group B
officer who gets into Class I/Group A at the age of 40 or earlier are treated
to be in creamy layer. If the father is directly recruited Class III/Group C
or Class IV/Group D employee and he gets into Class I/Group A at the age of
40 or earlier, his sons and daughters shall not be treated to be falling in
creamy layer.

8.
In regard to clauses (vi), (vii) and (viii) of para 4, it is clarified that
the creamy layer status of a candidate is determined on the basis of the status
of his parents and not on the basis of his own status or income or on the basis
of status or income or on the basis or status or income of his/her spouse. Therefore,
while determining the creamy layer status of a person the status or the income
of the candidate himself or of his/her spouse shall not be taken into account.

9.
In regard to clause (ix) of para 4, it is clarified that the creamy layer status
of sons and daughters of persons employed in organizations where equivalence
or comparability of posts vis-à-vis posts in Government has not been
evaluated is determined as follows: Income of the parents from the salaries
and from the other Sources [other than salaries and agricultural land] is determined
separately. If either the income of the parents from the salaries or the income
of the parents from other sources [other than salaries and agricultural land]
exceeds the limit of Rs.2.5 lakh per annum for a period of three consecutive
years, the sons and daughters of such persons shall be treated to fall in creamy
layer. But the sons and daughters of parents whose income from other sources
is also less than Rs.2.5 lakh per annum and income from other sources is also
less than Rs.2.5 lakh per annum will not be treated as falling in creamy layer
even if sum of the income from salaries and the income from the other sources
is more than Rs.2.5 lakh per annum for period of three consecutive years. It
may be noted that income from agricultural land is not taken into account while
applying the Test.

10.
In regard to clause (x) of para 4, it is clarified that while applying the Income/Wealth
Test to determine creamy layer status of any candidate as given in Category-VI
of the Schedule to the OM, income from the salaries and income from the agricultural
land shall not be taken into account. It means that if income from salaries
of the parents of any candidate is more than Rs.2.5 lakh per annum, income from
agricultural land is more than Rs.2.5 lakh per annum, but income from other
sources is less than Rs.2.5 lakh per annum, the candidate shall not be treated
to be falling in creamy layer on the basis of Income/Wealth Test provided his
parent(s) do not possess wealth above the exemption limit as prescribed in the
Wealth Tax Act for a period of three consecutive years.

11.
You are requested to bring the contents of this letter to all concerned in the
State.

Yours
faithfully,

(K.G.
Verma) Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of India.

Copy
to:

All
Ministries/Departments of Govt. of India.

Department of Economic Affairs (Banking Division), New Delhi.

Department of Economic Affairs (Insurances Division),New Delhi

Department of Public Enterprises, New Delhi.

Railway Board,

Union Public Service Commission/Supreme Court of India/ Election Commission/Lok
Sabha Secretariat/Rajya Sabha Secretariat/Cabinet Secretariat/Central Vigilance
Commission/ President’s Secretariat/Prime Minister’s Office/Planning
Commission/National Commission for Backward Classes.

Staff Selection Commission ,CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi.

Office of the Comptroller & Auditor General of India, 10, Bahadur Shah Zafar
Marg, New Delhi. With the request to bring the contents of this letter to the
notice of all concerned.